Official decisions and limited context

Leading decisions worth knowing

These summaries support research. They do not establish that a decision applies to a particular ticket.

View the resourceSources checked : 2026-07-21
Editorial policy
We prioritize official Supreme Court decisions, neutral citations and original summaries. We do not automatically reproduce CanLII decisions and do not publish win rates by judge.

Strict liability and due diligence

R. v. Sault Ste. Marie, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 1299

A leading decision on the classification of regulatory offences and the due-diligence defence. Its application depends on the wording of the offence and the evidence in the specific file.

Read the official judgment

Random traffic stops and the Charter

R. v. Ladouceur, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1257

The Court considered arbitrary detention during a random traffic stop and its justification. The decision does not, by itself, determine whether a particular stop was lawful.

Read the official judgment

Right to be tried within a reasonable time

R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 631

A leading decision on section 11(b) of the Charter. Delay calculations include exclusions and exceptions; application to a provincial penal matter must be assessed case by case.

Read the official judgment

Recent decisions

A recent decision will be added only after checking its official source, appeal status, limited holding and actual relevance to Quebec traffic law.

Editorial monitoring active